Categories
- Advertising (70)
- Audio (only) (4)
- Audio-Visual (7)
- Commerce (80)
- Discussions (21)
- Domains & Domain Names (47)
- Experts (24)
- Games (6)
- HTML (4)
- Marketing (70)
- Media Types (11)
- Plain Text (4)
- Projects (18)
- Statistics (5)
- Text (7)
- Uncategorized (2)
- Video (only) (4)
- Websites & Website Design (20)
Latest Postings
- Mon, 2009-Jan-5: What is the cost of cutting taxes?
- Wed, 2008-Dec-31: Adam Kmiec Calls BS on BW's Social Media "Voice of Innovation" Campaign
- Tue, 2008-Dec-30: How to Organize a 100% Online Conference?
- Sat, 2008-Dec-27: Yes, We Can Change the Paradigm!
- Thu, 2008-Dec-25: What Do People Mean When They Say We Live in an Information Economy?
- Wed, 2008-Dec-24: What Does Twitter Mean?
- Tue, 2008-Dec-23: I Don't Believe in Privacy
- Sat, 2008-Dec-20: Maximizing Profit / ROI :: How to Efficiently Gather Information from Tracking ("Following") Personal User Accounts in Social Networks
- Thu, 2008-Dec-18: Beyond the Social Web: Foundations of Online Communities
- Wed, 2008-Dec-17: One Thing Web 2.0 Got Wrong
Links
Web Links
Archives
Google Gimmick AdWords Lawsuit
Does Google Profit from Fraudulent Advertising?
Yes? No? Maybe so?
Is Google Responsible for AdWords content?
Yes! IMHO it is definitely responsible! Contrary to people who contend that Google is “only the messenger”, Google is actually not simply the messenger — they do exercise editorial review of the ads published.
So the question is: can Google be held accountable for publishing misleading ads? (see e.g. informationweek.com)
My answer: Yes!
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.